<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Efficient Scala with Primitive Collections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.juma.me.uk/2008/09/15/efficient-scala-with-primitive-collections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.juma.me.uk/2008/09/15/efficient-scala-with-primitive-collections/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:51:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArtemGr</title>
		<link>http://blog.juma.me.uk/2008/09/15/efficient-scala-with-primitive-collections/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>ArtemGr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ijuma.wordpress.com/?p=4#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ismael Juma</title>
		<link>http://blog.juma.me.uk/2008/09/15/efficient-scala-with-primitive-collections/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Ismael Juma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ijuma.wordpress.com/?p=4#comment-79</guid>
		<description>ArtemGr,

Of course I am not joking. As I said the feature has been in development in the JDK7 tree and you can follow the links to the OpenJDK mailing list messages talking about it to verify. Or download build 41 of JDK7 and test it for yourself.

Ismael

Update: The links provided in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.juma.me.uk/2008/12/17/objects-with-no-allocation-overhead/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;post dedicated to that&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ArtemGr,</p>
<p>Of course I am not joking. As I said the feature has been in development in the JDK7 tree and you can follow the links to the OpenJDK mailing list messages talking about it to verify. Or download build 41 of JDK7 and test it for yourself.</p>
<p>Ismael</p>
<p>Update: The links provided in a <a href="http://blog.juma.me.uk/2008/12/17/objects-with-no-allocation-overhead/" rel="nofollow">post dedicated to that</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArtemGr</title>
		<link>http://blog.juma.me.uk/2008/09/15/efficient-scala-with-primitive-collections/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>ArtemGr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ijuma.wordpress.com/?p=4#comment-78</guid>
		<description>&gt; escape analysis in HotSpot

Are you joking?

Escape analysis itself is implemented, but I never heard of the optimizations based on it being actually implemented in the JDK.

cf. http://weblogs.java.net/blog/kohsuke/archive/2008/03/deep_dive_into.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; escape analysis in HotSpot</p>
<p>Are you joking?</p>
<p>Escape analysis itself is implemented, but I never heard of the optimizations based on it being actually implemented in the JDK.</p>
<p>cf. <a href="http://weblogs.java.net/blog/kohsuke/archive/2008/03/deep_dive_into.html" rel="nofollow">http://weblogs.java.net/blog/kohsuke/archive/2008/03/deep_dive_into.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Objects with no allocation overhead &#171; Ismael Juma</title>
		<link>http://blog.juma.me.uk/2008/09/15/efficient-scala-with-primitive-collections/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Objects with no allocation overhead &#171; Ismael Juma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ijuma.wordpress.com/?p=4#comment-76</guid>
		<description>[...] ever do, but it&#8217;s actually quite common in languages like Scala (as described in a previous post). In Java-land, if you use the Function class from Google Collections with primitive wrappers, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ever do, but it&#8217;s actually quite common in languages like Scala (as described in a previous post). In Java-land, if you use the Function class from Google Collections with primitive wrappers, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
